Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 improvements
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:08:09 -0400
 
> No, they're identical in size.
> 
> Someone on the LUF has done some work showing that the M9 is about one stop
> behind the Nikon D3X in terms of image noise. You'll need to be registered
> to see the graphs, and I lack the skills to say how accurate the analysis 
> is
> - though no one has commented to say that the analysis is wrong. Details
> here...

You'd expect that.
The M9 is a near super camera at 18Mp's
The D3x is 24.5  Mp's.
The m9 is 18
The m9 should be less noisy.


21.1  gets the EOS-1Ds Mark III
I bet its just a tad noisier.

Mark William Rabiner
Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
 In reply to: Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M9 improvements)