Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:53:04 -0500

> Dave Olson wrote:
> 
>>>> 
> Is it because they are digital? To show you how slow I am, I thought the 
> R8.2
> or the R 9 were digital. Or are they?
> <<<
> 
> The R8 & R9 are digital only when the (scarce, big, discontinued) DMR is
> attached.
> 
> There might be some herd mentality involved but for me the switch to 
> digital
> (DMR in my case) made a big transformation in my work.  I miss the 
> simplicity,
> smaller size and viewfinder brilliance of the Leicaflex SL but from what I 
> see
> the results speak for themselves.  It's also getting more difficult to find
> good E6 and C41 film processing, even in a medium-sized city like 
> Sacramento.
> 
> We're also seeing some outstanding powerful editing tools for digital 
> images,
> for example for stitching multiple exposures or HDR stuff.  These, like any
> tool, can and will be over-used at times but they open a lot of options to
> their users.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
I have zero nostalgia for film or working in the darkroom.


Mark William Rabiner





Replies: Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)