Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?
From: thurmanphoto at gmail.com (Wendy Thurman)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:23:42 +0500
References: <1221585813.4002271257361118500.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <AE6636DA-2C51-4D91-80AD-1D9540729AA6@embarqmail.com> <a3f189160911041817p11e62aefw1f1ffef9a3a1c902@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0911041822g27c3235eu4c16d41dfa47805a@mail.gmail.com> <8F7E6DDD-1F73-4B28-9658-67B6E17D7330@embarqmail.com> <7ac27f4f0911041856n426c13a5v578624256ce2189d@mail.gmail.com> <41698E4A-041D-46C4-9E19-18840E46EAA1@embarqmail.com> <7ac27f4f0911042134u3f337fd0kd31cfa3efafaeb08@mail.gmail.com> <f681deda0911042242n3fbe9298hb3cdce19e9d24fe0@mail.gmail.com> <ee8fa51c0911050449h79d3a41bq2493c23bbc6713f2@mail.gmail.com>
Marty-
Thanks for the clarifications; I knew I was on unsteady ground
knowledge-wise.
Wendy
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> wrote:
> > in a doorway with his hand on the door frame. His nails are black;
> possibly
> > as a result of repeated exposure to pyrogallic acid.
>
> That's from amidol exposure. It gets into your nails and then
> oxidises in the air, turning them black.
>
> > I experimented with it
> > as a developer for sheet films some years ago but it's difficult to work
> > with and very toxic.
>
> Pyrogallol is no more toxic than hydroquinone which is in many
> commercially available print developers.
>
> > I've never gotten rid of the stuff- don't know how I would.
>
> There are registered hazardous waste receivers who will dispose of it
> for you, but it will probably be expensive. The best thing to do
> would be to advertise to photographers who may want it. Someone would
> be sure to come and pick it up.
>
> M
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to:
Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from thurmanphoto at gmail.com (Wendy Thurman) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)