Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> That's actually exactly why I want to go back :-) > > I mean I do have one dSLR, a dRF, and a digicam. My monitor is > calibrated, my printer is a Z3100 that can print from canvas to rice > paper and everything in between. > > So B&W wetprint is for the occasion "fine arts" stuff. I would stop playing around with canvas and rice paper and put some 100% rag paper in your printer like serious photographers use for ""fine arts" stuff." You have an inject printer costing thousands that most serious photographers would die for and never get. I'd use it with more intelligence and respect. Go to a serous photography gallery. See if you can tell the difference between the inkjet prints and the silver gelatin prints without reading the labels. But more importantly do some reading. Nobody calls them "wet prints". Ansel Adams if that's that's the reason for the darkroom stuff did not get a print out in one step using and analyzer and then sticking the print in a slot processor. Did not use a color head. He crafted in image making several test prints and making test strips. It took some time. Its easy enough to read how serious darkroom work is done in the past decades. Its not in the wedding section of the phone book. Mark William Rabiner