Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Child and bycicle 2nd vs
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:53:41 +0100
References: <1D9AFC19-7578-4CF1-9A90-16B57F786F2B@gmail.com> <82F77A34-4347-4B77-B775-6B9CDB6C9A48@mac.com>
 
Thank you very much Hugh to have take a look and commented,

Saludos
Lluis

El 09/11/2009, a las 8:37, Hugh Thompson escribi?:

> Lluis - since the subject is much further forward my eye now sees it  
> immediately .......
>
> Hugh
>
>
> On 9-Nov-09, at 5:42 AM, Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote:
>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2009100108+2.jpg.html
>>
>> I've posted a second version lighten a litle more the shadows and  
>> cropping the woman at the right, I thik she was distracting.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Child and bycicle 2nd vs)
Message from hewthompson at mac.com (Hugh Thompson) ([Leica] Child and bycicle 2nd vs)