Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Thought question re antialiasing
From: dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:37:37 -0500
References: <494971.52240.qm@web83908.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <20091120032721.GA2535@d242.scdc1.swarthmore.edu>
 
They do span more than one pixel - that's why they're called offset.  And 
that is why I asked.

Dante

On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Tim Gray wrote:

> On Thu 19, Nov'09 at  1:11 PM -0800, Dante Stella wrote:
>> Why wouldn't offset microlenses act as a species of antialiasing filter?
> 
> They would if each individual lens spanned more than one pixel :D 
> Otherwise, it really doesn't factor in.
> 
> Once pixel density gets high enough for diffraction to rear it's ugly head 
> in a major way at ALL apertures, I think we'll be able to do away with 
> antialiasing filters.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] Thought question re antialiasing)
 In reply to: Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] Thought question re antialiasing)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] Thought question re antialiasing)