Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob, I couldn't retake the photo, but a little Photoshop work did help. I softened or eliminated some of the background areas that were of no importance to the photo. What do you think? Is that allowed? Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert D. Baron" <rbaron at concentric.net> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Splat the Cat, Version 2 >I agree. > > I wonder....if you had taken a half or full step to your left, could > you have eliminated all or most of the 'empty' space in the upper left > hand quadrant of this shot? > > Could you have thrown it more out of focus or is this camera/lens > combination limited by the short focal length? > > Inquiring Minds Want To Know. > > ;-) > > Nonetheless, it is a nice photograph that I am sure will be much > appreciated in years to come. > > --Bob > > ==On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:45 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at > mac.com> > wrote: >> I find this version far more visually interesting and in some way more >> intimate >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> On Nov 27, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Jim Nichols wrote: >> >>> Dr. Ted Grant pointed out the direct eye contact in the earlier posting, >>> which detracts from the image quality. >>> >>> I went back to the RAW images and found one other, which may actually be >>> better. Comments are welcomed. >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Splat+the+Cat+2.jpg.html >>> >>> Jim Nichols >>> Tullahoma, TN USA >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >