Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] GF-1 getting trashed on Wired.com
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:38:40 -0800
References: <9F07836ED74F1C42AA69DFBAF8A1E2F13785087807@MBX1.asc.local> <36172e5a1001191410pa1f6630u75582f910e82dccb@mail.gmail.com>
 
That statement is correct.



At 8:10 AM +1000 1/20/10, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>My favourite posted comment:
>  "Because the registration distance for u43 is so small, the lens adapters
>don't need glass elements to refocus, and thus no light is lost."
>
>
>Cheers
>Geoff

-- 

    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
In reply to: Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] GF-1 getting trashed on Wired.com)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] GF-1 getting trashed on Wired.com)