Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The problem with Robot lenses is that they weigh a ton. Everything in
the Robot lineup weighs a lot more than I'm willing to carry and they
don't suit the lightweight G series.
The mount is actually an interrupted thread bayonet, and is probably
the most secure and solid lensmount ever made. Also, since the basic
design is for a 24x24 camera, and only later did they add a 24x36,
the diameter of the mount is rather small, and the lenses are
therefore generally slow although a couple were f/2 and f/1.9.
At 11:00 AM -0400 4/11/10, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote:
>Al writes:
>"For the adventurous owner of a GF-1 who does not have the 20mm/f1.7 lens,
>here
>
>is an alternate source for a fairly-thin pancake lens. You can modify an
>Industar 69 (28mm f2.8 LTM lens for Chaika half-frame camera) and use
>it with an
>LTM adapter."
>
>
>That looks like a vary nice adaptation. But Russian lenses are not the
>only candidates for adaption. If you hunt through the old lens bins at
>camera store clearance sales there are a number of high quality lenses
>with a short back focus that could be modified to fit a micro 4/3
>mount. Lenses for Robot cameras had, as I recall, a back focus of
>30mm, as did lenses for the Olympus Pen F. The Robot lenses were made
>by Zeiss and were very highly regarded. They had focal lengths from
>32.5mm through 75mm. The mount was a very simple screw thread and
>could be easily altered. Calumet sold several adapters for the Robot
>lenses. The Oly Pen lenses could be similarly modified. The Pen F
>series of cameras had excellent lenses. Trust Eugene Smith.
>
>Larry Z
>
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com