Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] two questions for the LUGger expertise
From: photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:57:03 -0400
References: <w2m19b6d42d1004142233zab58c530wada2766741103218@mail.gmail.com>

DR Summicron eyes are easily removable. They are only used when the
lens is in close focus mode.
Phil Forrest


On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:33:24 -0400
Vince Passaro <passaro.vince at gmail.com> wrote:

> 1. A simple question: can the 'eyes' be easily taken off and put on
> the 50 Summicron DR or is it like the 35 Summacron where you can't
> take it off or you'll wreck the lens' focusing capacity? Which is to
> say can't you take it off to use on, say, a G1, or a Bessa 2A, and
> put it back when you get the shiny M3 or M4 of your dreams?
> 
> 2. A less simple question: the ongoing thread about Leica lenses on
> the GF1 began with some commentary that included language that
> depicted using the 50/1.4 on the GF1 as having a "100/1.4" lens on
> the camera. I see this all the time, the equation of the half crop
> with a lens twice as long. But isn't what one has really a 50mm image
> with a 25% crop off all four sides? And a slightly narrower (more
> tele) angle of view? Please correct me in however I've gotten this
> wrong.  But I'm pretty sure that having a half-sized sensor is not
> the same as putting a 2x converter on a full frame. It doesn't yield
> the same image at all. Why do people say this?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] two questions for the LUGger expertise)