Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic
From: leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson)
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:20:28 -0500
References: <9947475.1278603624534.JavaMail.root@elwamui-little.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Phil,

The photog had nothing to do with the retouch decisions.  It was an
editorial call.  So no matter how upright you are as a photog, you are
always at the mercy of your client.

Leo Wesson
Photographer/Videographer
817.733.9157
www.leowesson.com



On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Philip F <photo.forrest at earthlink.net> 
wrote:
>
>>> That is not the truth, Philip, that is -your- opinion. Many people may 
>>> share your opinion, many may differ, but you can not be the arbiter of 
>>> "truth".
>>> Nobody on this list is.
>>> Frank
>>>
>>> On 7 Jul, 2010, at 22:31, Philip Forrest wrote:
>>>
>>>> The truth is that it's just wrong to edit a photo as much as the one in
>>>> question. That's the truth.
>>>>
>>>> Phil Forrest
>>>
>>
>>Frank is right, Phil, and I hope some day you will come to understand that.
>>
>>--Bob
>
>
> And for that I'm glad.
> I'm proud to hold myself and my work up to a higher standard.
> Phil Forrest
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip F) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)