Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]sorry, not near the printer Ansel was... Leo Wesson Photographer/Videographer 817.733.9157 www.leowesson.com On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:26 AM, LeoWesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote: > Considering that this guy wouldn't be near the printer answer was, it > looks pretty plausible to me. > > http://ricknorsigian.com/ > > Leo > > On Jul 28, 2010, at 7:12 AM, John Edwin Mason <profmason at yahoo.com> > wrote: > >> Richard's right. ?Ansel's grandson does dispute the authenticity of the >> photos. ?His argument doesn't seem particularly strong to me. ?My guess >> is that it's about protecting the brand -- and the profits. >> >> Here's a story from the Telegraph: >> >> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-news/7913901/Ansel-Adams-discovery-sparks-row-as-family-say-negatives-are-fakes.html >> >> --John >> >> ****************************** >> John Edwin Mason, Photography: >> http://www.JohnEdwinMason.com >> Charlottesville and Cape Town >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >