Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I saw this posted on The Online Photographer today and first thought it might be humor, but it is evidently real. If prints from Uncle Earl's negs bring $7,500, then surely mine must have some value. Here I'm referring to a bunch of negatives I bought from a liquidation sale of an inhabitant of a loft in Manhattan, around 1966. There were a whole bunch of big open reel tapes included, mostly jazz. Ken Carney On 7/29/2010 6:15 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: > I'm not surprised that the provenance is disputed. Actually I expected > that, > if they were accepted to be Ansel Adams' work there may be an ownership > dispute. If the claims were true (and I have no clue of course) the > originals allegedly destroyed by fire with many others would still belong > to > the creator (or rather his estate arrangements) in my view. > > Now the question is will original work claimed to be by uncle Earl fetch > the > same prices???? ;-) > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > On 30 July 2010 08:50, Ken Carney<kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote: > > >> In case you haven't seen this: >> >> http://www.ktvu.com/news/24432262/detail.html >> >> Ken Carney >> Oklahoma City, Oklahoma >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >