Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 17:18:42 -0400

Once you have a larger sized sheet film neg in your hands you have a slew of
so called "alternate" processes to choose from at the top of the list tends
to be Platinum. And silver gelatin is on the list for sure.
People, including E Weston who were were just talking about enlarged to
8x10. 
But that's a loss of a generation.

When you simply "output to film negative" in effect from a Photoshop file it
does not feel like you are adding a generation to the process. You don't
feel like you're loosing anything in a translation or transformation.



-- 
Mark William Rabiner
mark at rabinergroup.com


> From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:10:07 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?
> 
> You can do that digitally today:
> 
> http://www.alternativephotography.com/books/db_diginegs.html
> 
> <http://www.alternativephotography.com/books/db_diginegs.html>Tina
> 
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> I am totally mesmerized by the "idea" of making 8x10 contact prints and am
>> intrigued that other than Ed Weston none of them it seems did that but
>> projection printed the negs even when making 8x10 sized prints.
>> Ever hear about the self masking thing that a contact print has?
>> Each grain self masks itself from the light bouncing around the room .
>> That's what gets me. I'm sure I'll be doing some before it all goes.
>> The last negatives I ever shoot may be 8x10.
>> But I'm interested in shooting 8x10s from all angles.
>> I should just shoot c41 have them run it and scan them on a medium range
>> flatbed. Then print them same size and call them digital contacts. I
>> already
>> do that with 4x5.
>> 
>> http://rabinergroup.com/Catagorypages/Halloween2001.html
>> Though these were scanned from a pre punched contact sheet.
>> I have others scanned from the negs.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> mark at rabinergroup.com
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 15:31:45 +1000
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?
>>> 
>>> My print you mean? It is this one from 1945, taken with an 8x10 view
>> camera.
>>> It is printed to the negative size but is not a contact print.
>>> 
>>> 
>> http://www.anseladams.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=5010125&Show=ExtInfo
>>> 
>>> You can read the technical details from there if interested. I have a
>> very
>>> well printed book (Yosemite and the High Sierra) which contains this
>>> photograph too but of course the print is very best thing to hold and
>> admire
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Geoff
>>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 1 August 2010 15:20, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Do you recall if it was late in his career when he was shooting with the
>>>> Hasselblad or earlier with sheet film?
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>> mark at rabinergroup.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
>>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 14:33:34 +1000
>>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mine is a silver gelatin print from an original negative, printed by
>> Alan
>>>>> Ross. I don't claim any rarity or collectibility for that of course but
>>>>> there is just one source and one skilled darkroom printmaker for these
>>>>> and has been since 1975 after he worked as Ansel Adams' assistant. If
>> it
>>>> was
>>>>> exceedingly rare or collectible then I simply couldn't justify spending
>>>>> perhaps 8 or 10,000 dollars or more for a print. However it is from
>>>> Ansel's
>>>>> creation, has been meticulously made and is gorgeous to my eyes. My
>> print
>>>> is
>>>>> professionally and archivally framed and hangs where I can look at it
>> and
>>>>> enjoy it every single say. I don't have anything from Yosemite that I
>>>> shot
>>>>> hanging within sight of it ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Geoff
>>>>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)