Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have LR sort the photos within folders by capture time and that works for me. As long as my folders are intelligently and consistently named. Which of course is another problem..... <g> Truthfully, I agree with you, Frank, and this latest (LR3) is an even worse mess. Add to that Adobe's alleged tech support which is half a world and many many time zones away from me and is composed of non-native English speakers trying to communicate by reading from out-dated scripts prepared for them by marketing types, engineers and lawyers (have I missed offending anyone?) and it is migraine inducing for sure. I do not understand exactly how a product can be in public beta as long as LR3 was and yet come out with so many glitches and bugs. LR is great conceptually IMHO but it is becoming PhotoShop and I am afraid that is not a good thing. --Bob ==On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> wrote: > That is what I do. It got more difficult to do when I got Lightroom, since > it wants to do something else, though I have no idea what it is. Since > upgrading to Lightroom 3 about 1000 recent pictures have gone missing. I > can find them on my hard drive, thankfully, and I can try reimporting > them, but Lightroom tells me they are already imported. If they are I am > f*cked if I can find them from within Lightroom. However good the > rendering etc may be I am not sure I want to persist with Lightroom. Every > time I manage to get it the way I want it the "upgrade" changes the way > the screen and files are laid out and I can't find any of my pictures. > I have been mega frustrated by Lightroom, it took me ages to get v1 laid > out the way I liked it and v2 completely changed all my setting to a new > standard layout which I did not like and never got quite as useful (to me) > as v1 had been. Lightroom 3 has, it seems screwed my system even more > royally than v2 did. There are good features and it works well > technically, but the file handling and screen layout just do not suit me > at all. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh. > Frank > > On 9 Aug, 2010, at 21:44, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> year/month/day will sort your photos but then you have to figure out what >> to >> do when you shoot more than one photo a day. >> Oh I guess you could label your daily folders that way. I wish I had. >> >> -------------------- >> Mark William Rabiner >> Photography >> mark at rabinergroup.com >> >> >>> From: Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:46:19 -0400 >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Today is 8/9/10 >>> >>> year/month/day is sure better for keeping track of photos because it >>> makes >>> them show up in chronological order when arranged alphabetically in >>> computer >>> windows. >>> >>> ric >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > Greystacks, > 18 Denchworth Road, > Wantage, > OX12 9AU > > +44 (0)1235 768505 > +44 (0)7803 135214 > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >