Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Dinghies at the dock. Content vs. quality.
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:57:24 -0400

I check and see a Fuji quick snap shoots film
http://www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/quicksnap.htm

Seems he had his film scanned at an above average place which he thinks is
better than Costco one would think.

Being naked or wearing a small swim suit is a great excuse for not having a
camera on one.
But we can scan a neg.

--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
mark at rabinergroup.com


> From: Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:33:58 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] IMG: Dinghies at the dock. Content vs. quality.
> 
> Sometimes content trumps quality. I came across this scene a while back. I
> had been swimming and had no camera. But my grand daughter had a Fuji
> Quicksnap disposable camera which I commandeered for a picture.
> Unfortunately the prints came back on textured paper, sort of a crummy 
> cloth
> like surface. The scan was the best I could do. No Leica, but it sure beats
> a Holga.
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Larry+Z/Dinghies+2.jpg.html
> Larry Z
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] IMG: Dinghies at the dock. Content vs. quality.)