Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Mysterious Bearded Antelope Photographed
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:01:47 -0400

An image can appear over processed. Over Photoshoped. But the same could be
said to or for a darkroom print. You go for a balance and sometimes you
don't succeed. At least your trying. You are image making. Not just getting
the jpegs which pop out of your camera and uploading them.

--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
mark at rabinergroup.com


> From: Jefffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:46:24 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Mysterious Bearded Antelope Photographed
> 
> It implies "edited", so the degree and type are left wide open. But I'm 
> afraid
> that "it has been photoshopped" is more inclined to imply gross distortion
> rather than airbrushing, at least in the street dictionary. The trick is
> making it look like it hasn't been photoshopped.
> 
> Jeffery




In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Mysterious Bearded Antelope Photographed)