Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like the extra half stop over the Summilux. And I have the Summicron ASPH plus other Leica glass. So you do not need to convince me about the merits of Leica optics. But the CV 35 is right there. Perhaps not as good as the current Summilux at f1.4 but a lot better at f1.2 and better than any previous Summilux at all apertures. Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog YNWA On Aug 23, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > I'm just very fond of the Leica company for some odd reason I don't know > why. It's just a quirk of mine. I think when one uses the word "best" it > when they are looking for the best. The "best lens" M mount new not used > lens for 800 bucks might be the Cosina 35mm 1.2 whatever. > But a Summilux 1.4 from Leica is hand made from real nice glass which cost > some real money and cost 5 grand and represents the latest Leica cutting > edge design. > If best was what I was after I'd same my lunch money and get the Summilux. > If "interesting, not so expensive by 6.3 times and just a tad faster I'd > buy > the Cosina monster. But I'd not call it "the best lens" that's ridiculous > when there is an option from Leica which is gorgeous optical perfection > with > nothing spared. > Leica gives you the option of really getting "the best". That's what > interests me about it. There are such great photo companies out there. > Highly competitive. Canon. Nikon. Cosina. Amazing stuff. Amazing but not > "the best". > I hope I'm not boring Nathan. > > -------------------- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > mark at rabinergroup.com > > >> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:22:09 +0930 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] new 75mm M lens >> >> And the main engineering solution to the near-far correction problem >> is a floating element, which Cosina is not set up to manufacture. I'd >> have preferred a design like the 35/1.2 with little focus shift but >> lower overall contrast. But I already have a 75 Summilux. >> >> Marty >> >> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Henning Wulff <henningw at >> archiphoto.com> >> wrote: >>> It takes a rather large amount of effort and expense to get rid of >>> spherical >>> aberration, which is the main cause of focus shift. The problem is that >>> if >>> you just try to use aspherics to get rid of spherical aberration at long >>> distances you are likely to get overcompensated spherical aberration at >>> some >>> distance and apertures, and that is one of the main causes for nasty >>> bokeh. >>> >>> This lens is supposedly based on the old Heliar design from Voigtl?nder >>> of >>> old; mainly the large format lens designs that were the classic portrait >>> lenses of their time. These had a 'glow' which was very appealing, and >>> the >>> focus shift could be dealt with by re-checking the focus after stopping >>> down. It was never that serious, and since pixel peeping had not yet been >>> invented, often went unnoticed. >>> >>> >>> At 1:30 PM -0700 8/20/10, mehrdad wrote: >>>> >>>> tom a mentions about a glow wide open , which i translate to focus >>>> shift. >>>> all the latest cosina lenses have focus shift syndrome, i wonder why! >>>> and >>>> leica is getting away from it as fast as they can. >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Henning Wulff >>>> <henningw at archiphoto.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I had a chance to play a bit with Tom Abrahamsson's copy of the lens. >>>>> It >>>>> looks very nice, and seems a bargain at the likely price of $7-800US. >>>>> It's >>>>> about halfway in size and weight between the 75/2 and 75/1.4 of >>>>> Leica's. >>>>> The >>>>> hood is not built in, but can be reversed with a unique screw in/clamp >>>>> on >>>>> two part design that seems a bit fiddly. >>>>> >>>>> I didn't do any rigorous testing, but it seems more like the Summilux >>>>> in >>>>> character and would make an excellent portrait lens, hence 'Heliar >>>>> Classic'. >>>>> It seems very sharp though at f/1.8 with very pleasing bokeh. It seems >>>>> to >>>>> have some focus shift, just like the Summilux, but it's very little. >>>>> Unfortunately, like the 75/2.5, it only focusses to .9m. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> At 5:17 PM +1000 8/20/10, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> For anyone interested a friend of mine is the local distributor for >>>>>> Voigtlander products and he has just released details of a new 75mm M >>>>>> mount >>>>>> lens in their range. You can read the detail on his blog here. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://mainlinephoto.wordpress.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> Geoff >>>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> >>> * Henning J. Wulff >>> /|\ Wulff Photography & Design >>> /###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com >>> |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >