Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina writes: "Jayanand - I wouldn't do it! If you read the small print on the baggage claim, the airlines refuse to accept any responsibility for checked camera equipment. It will disappear for sure. Instead, you could FedEx it ahead to your destination. That way you could at least insure it against loss or damage. Tina On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com >wrote: I am getting fed up of carrying large lenses in hand baggage during the flights for my wildlife trips. Can anyone recommend a hard case in which I can dump large lenses and check it in? It should take a Nikon 200-400 f4 as well as a 600mm f4. Cheers Jayanand _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information - - - - - - This may well be a justification for smaller camera sizes, at least for the casual traveler. Professionals and those on serious photo safaris should probably follow Tina's advice and have their bulky and expensive gear shipped by Fedex, UPS, DHL or other package transport services. Don't forget insurance either. But vacationers and other casual travelers appreciate the convenience of small sized equipment. Don't get uptight Mark. I'm not saying that the quality of the 4/3 format can match that of full frame. Nor will the stock houses usually accept photos made with these cameras. But the ability to stick an EPL1 in one pocket and a decent zoom lens in the other makes flying without weighty camera bags a breeze. In prior years I traveled all over the world both for business reasons and for pleasure armed with nothing more than an Olympus OM2 and backup Rollei 35SE. Indeed on one two year stint in India, I had the misfortune to damage the Olympus and used the Rollei for most pictures. All pictures were suitable for their research purposes and a few were even picked up and published in travel magazines. Surprisingly in the switch from film to digital, professional camera sizes have increased although P&S camera sizes have significantly decreased. I long for a quality DSLR the size and solidity of the Olympus OM series or even the Leica III series. I neither need nor want the bells and whistles, including the 27 exposure modes built into most modern cameras. I can think for myself, thank you, and set the camera as needed. So when traveling and taking pictures for pleasure, not necessarily for wall mounting or publication, all you need is a camera of the size and capability for the task at hand. Just about any P&S on the market will make adequate 8 x 10s and exceptional 4 x 6 prints. On the web, even in the LUG gallery, it is almost impossible to distinguish between cameras covering a 50 to 1 price range unless you critically the examine the large size blowups. For that trip to Disney World, just about anything that you can slip into a jacket pocket will do. Often the "best" is the enemy of "good enough." Larry Z