Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/08/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Legs
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:24:42 -0500
References: <AANLkTi=+r+aAVfVDOY1CTgj-MCSfR8-uRiZO+RsuHBNh@mail.gmail.com> <20100829013554.2448957b@linux-wbgu.site> <66C05887-7D0F-4D2F-8AF9-07947A09061F@gmail.com> <20100829021523.5369025a@linux-wbgu.site> <5BA29308-0153-4D66-B38C-603825BFE287@mac.com> <20100829184918.5a32248e@linux-wbgu.site>
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Phil <photo.forrest at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
> That's the point of view of one of several women who have all said
> essentially the same thing The question that I ask is if the woman's
> perspective as the one being photographed is taken into account. Or
> should it be?
>
You need to stop hanging around with them Yankee women and find yourself a
red-neck girl, and get a little perspective.
--
Regards,
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
Natchitoches, Louisiana
USA
In reply to:
Message from pswango at att.net (Phil Swango) ([Leica] war is personal)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil) ([Leica] Legs)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Legs)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil) ([Leica] Legs)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Legs)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil) ([Leica] Legs)