Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] WTB: IR/UV filters
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:03:26 -0700
References: <04DF0FF6-097A-444A-9BAE-6470022554AA@sfr.fr> <C8A6EB9E.2CB6%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AANLkTimOehep+yHkQ2dE85Lbk8176FTEniDsrncRT5rb@mail.gmail.com> <p06230902c8a79995733f@192.168.1.22>

What I don't really understand is why does anyone need to justify either
decision to someone else and how someone's opinion or "100% of PROs"
opinions should have any weight on anyone else. I am just glad that we still
live in a (mostly) a free country :-)

On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at 
archiphoto.com>wrote:

>
>
> At present only polarizers are still sometimes laminated; most others are
> dyed in the mass. The latter would shatter.
>
> In earlier times coloured filters were laminated because the dyes could be
> controlled better in gel form than as dyes added to molten glass. They were
> abandoned when dyed in the mass became possible because the gels tended to
> fade relatively quickly, and they necessitated thicker filters which caused
> a lot of plano-parallelism problems. I once (in the 70's) checked about 50
> filters; over 75% of the laminated gel types had surfaces that weren't
> perfectly parallel which would cause serious problems with some lenses. The
> gels also didn't really provide any structural strength; not like the vinyl
> in laminated safety glass.
>
> As far as the UV filter argument goes, the filter ring ding vs. lens rim
> ding I can understand, but my lens shades do an even better job and they
> shade besides. Also, if you shatter the filter after whacking the lens
> against something, it does not necessarily follow that the front element
> would have been damaged if the filter had not been there. Maybe yes, maybe
> no.
>
> As you might guess from the above, I use filters when there is a good
> reason, but leave it off otherwise. I did some tests once which showed that
> under some circumstances the images gets slightly degraded when a filter is
> used. Not often, but still...
>
> If you use a filter, make sure the coatings are good. It doesn't have to be
> the most expensive one.
>
> --
>
>   *            Henning J. Wulff
>  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>  /###\   mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
>  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]


Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] WTB: IR/UV filters)
Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil) ([Leica] WTB: IR/UV filters)
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] WTB: IR/UV filters)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] WTB: IR/UV filters)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] WTB: IR/UV filters)