Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/09/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:21:50 -0400
References: <AANLkTinpGUTz7rc5NqoyXydFRFxDK3-NhFX9wdMzHqLm@mail.gmail.com> <1BC780C4-D0F8-484A-AE37-013C457826C1@mac.com> <AANLkTinpFuwBi8VmqPQLedz8BnBusdPUeeG2npmKoy46@mail.gmail.com> <A679E2C3-05E6-4D46-8676-8AC3B785F2CC@mac.com> <AANLkTinnZgWHYpMAnMxoaLznvH5AhbrZcfH8qXH+xQF3@mail.gmail.com> <927D3939-3B79-469D-B69C-BAAA66DA73DF@mac.com>
wouldn't a second mirror, just like the first, leave left and right, but
flip vertical?
Doesn't it take a pentaprism to reverse left/right?
ric
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:12 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:
> Well it certainly would be reversed if looking through only the one mirror.
> However that 45? finder would have to have a second mirror
> which would bring it back around.
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
In reply to:
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)