Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I realize that you're being tongue-in-cheek, as most of this thread is. I'm sort of surprised that Olympus even entered a world dominated by Canon and Nikon and did so with such a small sensor. It might have made sense if the camera and lenses were radically smaller or the optics/sensor were expected to get radically better. But watching the rapid demise of Contax digital shows how difficult it is to break into this market. Jeffery On Sep 14, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Richard Man wrote: > Jeff, I am just joking around. I am an E-3 user, starting with the OM-4T. > > Now I mostly shoot with E-3 (2X), M9 (1X) and the XPan (0.4x?) > > Of course Olympus has been running ads with John Issac's stuff, and he > works > for the Nat Geo. I heard him talk when the E-3 comes out, and he says he > was > able to get shots that couldn't be gotten otherwise because of the E system > features. So don't despair - your E1 and 25 'lux still have many good years > left :-) > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> This guy did, but with an Olympus P&S. I don't know about the Magnum part. >> >> http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-6468-7844 >> >> Jeffery >> >> > > -- > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com> > // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous > replies in your msgs. ] > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information