Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Format output obviousness
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:32:35 -0700
References: <AANLkTimdjDeLirmoziZFUbgEgE0WBzRwLb5f3wsck8Se@mail.gmail.com> <C8B5FA7C.3639%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I don't use a G10 :-)

E-3 for events / Taiko

M9 for just about anything and everything.

XPan for my "artsy visions," or when I want to use Tri-X.



On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:

> Its great to now that technique means nothing.
> " hand-held at 1/13th of a second." this gives us an image we can make
> discerning comparative evaluations from.
>
> A digital print black and white on rag paper which may have been 13x19:
> Harold Cummer handed me at Photokina 2006 sure looked a notch and half
> better than any 1.5 or 1 crop print I'd ever seen. Sold me on medium format
> digital. It jumped off the page and looked 3D.
>
> Richard if you're convinced now that a camera with a sensor the size of
> your
> pinky fingernail can match the output from full frame and or medium format
> digital backs than think of all the money you're going to save!
>
> Nothing matters! I'm glad I know that now!
>
> --------------------
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> mark at rabinergroup.com
>
>
> > From: Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:39:58 -0700
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Format output obviousness
> >
> > You tell that to Michael Reichmann:
> >
> > "At one point I found myself looking at raw files on-screen and not being
> > sure if I was looking at Hasselblad P45+ files or Canon G10 files. That
> > includes at 100% onscreen enlargements."
> >
> > and
> >
> > Over a two day period I invited photographers and local industry
> > professionals to come to my print studio and look at a series of 13X19"
> > prints from an *Epson 3800* printer made on *Ilford Gold Fiber Silk*
> paper
> > which were then hung side by side on my floor-standing print viewing box.
> > This collection of seven people included experienced photographers,
> people
> > from the commercial print industry, and other trade professionals.
> Between
> > them there was at least 200 years of photographic industry shooting and
> > printing experience.
> >
> > In most cases I did not tell them what they were looking at, simply
> saying
> > that I had been shooting with two cameras, and that they should divide
> the
> > prints (about a dozen) into two piles ? Camera A and Camera B. They were
> > asked to judge resolution, accutance, colour reproduction, highlight
> detail,
> > dMax, and any other factors that they wished to consider.
> > The Results
> >
> > In every case no one could reliably tell the difference between 13X19"
> > prints shot with the $40,000 Hasselblad and Phase One 39 Megapixel back,
> and
> > the new $500 Canon G10. In the end no one got more than 60% right, and
> > overall the split was about 50 / 50, with no clear differentiator. In
> other
> > words, no better than chance.
> >
> >
> > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Every portfolio I've ever had or stack of prints; and every stack of
> prints
> >> other photographers have shown me I've always known which ones of my
> prints
> >> were 35mm, Medium format, or sheet film and I didn't have to bother
> telling
> >> them and they didn't have to bother telling me; as we all knew at first
> >> glance.
> >> I can normally easily tell the difference between a full frame digital
> >> image
> >> even at low output and cropped format digital output and I think many
> >> people
> >> can with any experience. And certainly the difference between that and
> >> point
> >> and shoots with sensors the size of my pinky nail. And the 2x crop in
> >> between. And medium format digital blows me right out of the water at
> least
> >> my eyeballs.
> >> If you can't tell the difference between your large and smaller format
> >> digital output the time to hang it up is now.
> >> Take up audio.
> >>
> >> --------------------
> >> Mark William Rabiner
> >> Photography
> >> mark at rabinergroup.com
> >> .
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
> > // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
> previous
> > replies in your msgs. ]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]


In reply to: Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Format output obviousness)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Format output obviousness)