Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] (no subject)
From: chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:37:49 -0400
References: <6dfcba4d5bb89631f368bb1fb8f9032a.squirrel@mail.threshinc.com> <AANLkTikJQ4oFGQEzfhQ+8Z9MVL=v7rHaPLg7dmxoFXNi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=GcQxocLmj7S_HS7VErgYvpH6og7GL8+5Hn_O4@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=9O9oVBWcMOLPoamSgvjrjGTNq-y7Ui6aa6tJG@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinaox3qYyX2pWy3mX0HogqgZkiru9cE=K_TYQ-b@mail.gmail.com>
 
By controlling for the mediating factor of print size you obfuscate 
the relationship between the independent and dependant variables.

Equipment is best identified by comparing the quality of different 
sized prints.

Like saying if you take10 random people the same age I'm sure no one 
can tell when they will die.  Of course not, age is an important 
mediating factor for death.  At best you would be guessing.





At 01:50 PM 9/15/2010, you wrote:
>If I put 10 random prints of a similar size in
>front of anyone, I am sure they cannot identify the equipment.
In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] (no subject))