Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The world's SMALLEST 35mm lens ever for M... Not!
From: frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:41:00 +0000 (GMT)
References: <A2A3AE74-688D-4950-B848-F8B4F44988C6@yahoo.co.uk> <AANLkTim_8VUNaK60xK96TSxSNCVPk6+Fx5CoZ4qUSm38@mail.gmail.com> <957114.49826.qm@web86701.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <AANLkTinAf3xFPYdZf4tD30zNQP2M_waUUgKeqsGqPSh-@mail.gmail.com>

Ah sorry! I noticed Peter refer to this Tessar after the 35mm f3.5 triplet 
but 
did not pay close attention to its details until now.  I was still thinking 
of 
the triplet.
cheers,
Frank


----- Original Message ----
From: Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com>
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, 23 September, 2010 14:03:10
Subject: Re: [Leica] The world's SMALLEST 35mm lens ever for M... Not!

Frank,  I was speaking of this lens: *Miyazaki-shiki Tessar T* 35mm/f3.5   
*It
says "When you purchase the lens (center), metal lens cap (screw-in, left
front), metal lens hood (screw-in, front right photo) and three
fixed-aperture ring (respectively, f3.5, f5.6, f11 support) that comes with
that."
and
"The minimum focusing distance, 0.8m is.  Of course, infinity is out."

http://tinyurl.com/2v72nzb


On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM, FRANK DERNIE
<frank.dernie at btinternet.com>wrote:

> I don't think so, no, the aperture is conventional, although, since the
> whole
> kaboodle rotates with focus like the old lenses, the aperture index will
> not
> necessarily be found where one may expect it.
> I did not notice anything about not focussing to infinity though.
> FD
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com>
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 23 September, 2010 13:19:24
> Subject: Re: [Leica] The world's SMALLEST 35mm lens ever for M... Not!
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Peter Cheyne <geordiepete211 at 
> yahoo.co.uk
> >wrote:
>
> > That Cooke is maybe not the world's smallest 35mm for M.  Miyazaki-san
> also
> > offers this smaller Tessar 35mm:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/2v72nzb
> >
> > It needs a LTM to M adapter, but it's still smaller than the Cooke
> Miyazaki
> > 35.
> >
>
>
> But if you want to change the aperture, you have to dismount the lens and
> change a part, furthermore, it has no infinity?  Cute, but no cigar.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://sonc.com/look/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
>
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://sonc.com/look/
Natchitoches, Louisiana

USA

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from geordiepete211 at yahoo.co.uk (Peter Cheyne) ([Leica] The world's SMALLEST 35mm lens ever for M... Not!)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] The world's SMALLEST 35mm lens ever for M... Not!)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] The world's SMALLEST 35mm lens ever for M... Not!)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] The world's SMALLEST 35mm lens ever for M... Not!)