Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:06:58 -0500
References: <DAE10D35-8D80-43A1-9B13-CEC9F3CF86B1@mac.com>

love the light 
especially in the second

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist





On Sep 23, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Hugh Thompson wrote:

> On a trip to Qarabagh, in the country north of Kabul today, we visited the 
> office of an English language school, where we had tea:
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Hugh+Thompson/Afghanistan_001/Tea+for+one+or+tea+for+two++004.jpg.html>
> 
> and
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Hugh+Thompson/Afghanistan_001/Tea+for+one+or+tea+for+two++005.jpg.html>



Replies: Reply from hewthompson at mac.com (Hugh Thompson) ([Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?)
In reply to: Message from hewthompson at mac.com (Hugh Thompson) ([Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?)