Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Reduced development, particularly if he is going to scan them, is the way to go. The contrast will be incredibly high with normal development and the negs will be very thick. I accidentally exposed a roll of Neopan 400 at 50 last year and with very short development it came out fine. Marty On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Peter Cheyne <geordiepete211 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Last weekend my friend shot a roll of Neopan 400 in my M6. ?He is thinking > about buying one, so gave it a try. ?However, he set the ISO on the camera > at 100 by mistake. > > He wants to know if he should ask the developing store to pull it two > stops. > ?I wonder if it might be better to just hand them the film as usual. ?He > will scan the negatives himself, so is able to reduce 'exposure' ?with > software. > > My question: ?which is the better option? > > Thanks for reading, > > Peter Cheyne > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >