Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] No R solution
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:07:59 -0700
References: <mailman.2564.1285493773.66617.lug@leica-users.org> <70DE9FED-DC8B-413F-854A-16B2F31C88BF@netvigator.com>

On Sep 26, 2010, at 7:01 AM, H&ECummer wrote:

> Hi Luggers
> On Saturday the Leica User Forum met with Leica senior management. The 
> translation from the notes taken at the meeting has not yet been posted on 
> the LUF but by the  comments so far posted no R solution was discussed.


that likely would have been one of the first questions....


likely dead in the water...


why not even a discussion of the pro's & con's from leica's pov?


might be nice,


Steve






> If there had been one proposed I am certain that someone from the meeting 
> would have reported it to the LUF in capital letters. I hope to be proven 
> wrong but I think the R solution has gone stone cold dead on the back 
> burner. I guess I will now send my 21 - 35 to Leitax to be rebayonted for 
> Nikon. Sad really.
> Howard
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from cummer at netvigator.com (H&ECummer) ([Leica] No R solution)