Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]To me, it seems the reasoning is clear. An S2 sale would be a new body plus new lenses. A digital R body sale would most likely be body alone. Since the development cost of the bodies would be similar, the S2 decision is a no-brainer. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Saganich" <chs2018 at med.cornell.edu> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] couple local leica nuts comparing gear > Perhaps that answers the question about the future of the R. The R has > become an S. > > > At 01:42 PM 9/28/2010, you wrote: >><http://milleica.wordpress.com/2010/09/28/leica-s2-sighting-milwaukee/> >> >>Regards, >>George Lottermoser >>george at imagist.com >>http://www.imagist.com >>http://www.imagist.com/blog >>http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> >> >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > Chris Saganich MS, CPH > Senior Physicist, Office of Health Physics > Weill Medical College of Cornell University > New York Presbyterian Hospital > chs2018 at med.cornell.edu > http://intranet.med.cornell.edu/research/health_phys/ > Ph. 212.746.6964 > Fax. 212.746.4800 > Office A-0049 > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >