Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DIY 6-bit coding problems
From: geordiepete211 at yahoo.co.uk (Peter Cheyne)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:49:14 +0900

Hi Frank,

thanks for your response.  I'm not sure I know what you mean.  Could  
you explain this please?

"Axial Alignment is critical.  I found using  a lens that was coded  
correctly
as a example of placement, made a big difference in my success."

I guess you mean axial alignment of the the template is critical to  
get the sensor to read the code right.  I guess this is what you mean  
by placement too. Did I read it right?

Only one of my lenses (the Canon 35/2) is LTM, so I think I'll stick  
with DIY coding for now.  However, if I find the coding useful, I  
might well send my lenses to Mr Millich as Geoff says everyone ends up  
doing anyway.

Another question to anyone reading:  I only have 2 IR-cut filters--one  
for my 35 Nokton, and one for my 50 'Cron.  Does this mean when I use  
another coded but non-filtered lens I would be better off changing the  
menu setting from 'Lens detection on + UV/IR' to 'On'?

Peter Cheyne


Replies: Reply from dmorton at gmail.com (David Morton) ([Leica] DIY 6-bit coding problems)
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] DIY 6-bit coding problems)