Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi George, I certainly understand your point of view and, upon reflection, perhaps optimal cannot be an absolute, but has meaning only in relation to another tangible solution. I guess I arrived at my purchase conclusion somewhat subjectively. In the case of the DM-R and the M8, I didn't want a digital "crop camera" when I had full frame capabilities with the film bodies I had already purchased. I'm comfortable having waited for the M9, as it is a gorgeous solution, fully implemented from my point of view. Alas, the R-series decision I made has not turned out so well, at least up to the current time. I think I was becoming somewhat obsessive about a digital R-series solution as I have a non-trivial investment in the lenses. The transcript of the Leica executives' Photokina press conference was a good dose of reality, and caused me to re-evaluate, leading me to conclude that using film may not be today's "perfect" solution but for now, with these wonderful R-series lenses, it is certainly "good enough" to keep using and enjoying. Thanks for your feedback. Len --- On Oct 7, 2010, at 11:34 AM, lug-request at leica-users.org wrote: > I can only add that I don't agree that the DMR or M8 were sub-optimal when > they arrived. > The DMR remains the only and therefore optimal digital choice for using R > lenses in their fully operational modes. > And of course, while the M9 has replaced the M8 as optimal in the use of M > lenses in digital capture; > the M8 was optimal before the M9's arrival; and remains a very viable and > capable tool.