Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nikon is the one company that reversed the otherwise accepted nomenclature and definitions for 'macro' and 'micro'. They called their lenses that went from infinity to 1:1 or less 'micro', and 1:1 and higher magnification lenses 'macro' whereas the generally accepted usage was the reverse. At 3:11 PM -0400 10/27/10, Mark Rabiner wrote: >In these cases they really are micro not macro lenses it seems to me. > > >-------------------- >Mark William Rabiner >Photography >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >mark at rabinergroup.com >Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > > > > >> From: Fred Hess <fredhess at phenix-visuals.nl> >> Organization: Phenix Visuals NL >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:37:54 +0200 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] for nikon and/or macro enthusiasts >> >> More or less the same as the Leitz Photar range. I work with these >> Photar- >> lenses on my R-bellows and on my microscopes. These lenses have >> RMS-thread. >> Leitz made also a special set for the larger Aristophot-bellows with 40mm >> thread.. There was also a set of Milar-lenses for macro-photography. >> Great stuff for specialists! >> >> Regards >> >> Fred > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com