Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] R Mid-Range Zooms
From: topoxforddoc at btinternet.com (Charlie Chan)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:31:44 +0100
References: <AANLkTinWXPOwq7hffo8x41=x=DDFAnxn0KDX94wFt8Fx@mail.gmail.com>

Jim,

In order of performance (and funnily price too)

35-70/2.8 asph - stellar performance and price - really rare
28-90/2.8 asph - just discontinued when R line killed off - probably Leica's 
'best' mid range zoom - truly excellent performance and currently going for 
about GBP1200
35-70/4 - if you can accept the slow aperture, then it's actually pretty good
28-70 ROM - Sigma/Leica lens - not nearly as bad as some make out - it's 
cheap (for Leica) and perfectly acceptable - a bit of barrel distortion at 28
28-70 older lenses - not sure

Charlie Chan
Cheltenham, UK

topoxforddoc at btinternet.com
www.cancer-surgeon.co.uk
www.charlie-chan.co.uk



On 26 Oct 2010, at 01:50, James Laird wrote:

> Just to get off the D700 thread, I'd like the LUG's opinions of the
> 28-70 and 35-70 R zooms. Are they just rebadged Minolta lenses that
> are built better? Opinions for or against would be appreciated. I'm
> looking for a good zoom for my new Sony A900, and would be willing to
> use R glass with an adapter if it's worth the trouble, or should I
> just stick with Minolta/Sony/Zeiss glass?
> 
> Jim Laird
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] R Mid-Range Zooms)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] R Mid-Range Zooms Charlie Chan)
Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] R Mid-Range Zooms)
In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] R Mid-Range Zooms)