Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com> wrote: > In view of the above I remain quite skeptical about this article as a > whole. > I don't think they have a true handle on what's happening, just as DXO > doesn't seem to have a handle on some of their 'quality' criteria or > measurements. T stops. I remember when "they" decided to make it an issue for film cameras. It started to fall apart almost immediately. If I recall, not too many companies reissued lenses with T stops. Arriflex Zeiss lenses did it, but most of us did not rush out and sell our Angenieux lenses so we could join the club. After all, we were shooting Color Neg, and if we transferred to video on Rank chains or if we were going straight to print, we had great timers doing scene-by-scene corrections. I was shooting with a CP16 reflex with ttl exposure meter, but I still always took incident readings if I could. Later, most of my docs were with Aaton cameras, but always with Angenieux glass, so T stops were never anything I cared about. The article seems like it is blowing smoke. I am not too weird-ed out if my camera might change the iso slightly to make the picture better . . . but then, I'm never in a position to make images that are repeatable. Regards, Sonny http://sonc.com/look/ Natchitoches, Louisiana USA