Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bruce, I don't know that there has ever been a more accurate critique of my work. On Oct 28, 2010, at 2:46 PM, taichung00 wrote: > I've gone back and forth, Kyle, in assessment of your Digilux posts: > sometimes I believe you genuinely like the camera; sometimes I think > you're piling-on in making fun of the 'first and least among 'em'(digital, > that is); other times I wonder if it's ironic dissing of The Great Name -- > like flogging the Summitar. Maybe it's 'Look, Ma: no hands! (I can make > good photographs even with this sow.) Or self-congratulatory for all of > us: are not we Leica users unassailably right? Even our most dismissed > camera still can produce superior images. > > So, I will continue to be uncertain how to read you, I expect. But > absolutely certain to enjoy each contribution. I hope you will keep them > coming --- they're very good and great fun. > > I hope others will be inspired to submit work done with older-to-ancient > Leicas. Except in our Walter Mitty dreams, we're not all shooting M-9s or > S2s. > > Bruce Humphrey > > > --- On Thu, 10/28/10, kyle cassidy on the lug <leicaslacker at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > It's easy to see why the Ur Digilux is the choice of professionals and > serious camera collectors the world around. While many "weekend shooters" > rely on crutches like multi-megapixels, zoom and interchangeable lenses, > the Ur Digilux is for the camera purest who wants as little as possible > between themselves, and art. > > Inspired by words from Hamlet: > > http://www.kylecassidy.com/lj/2010/large-be-true.jpg > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information