Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Roofers at 2500 ISO
From: jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore)
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:11:14 -0400
References: <AANLkTimLBd+r-paAxBmfyGqeUM2oNdVqoQCfX71z+11o@mail.gmail.com> <c2f43104afef294b0c518967627b5f64.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com> <770C4B51-FE3B-43B1-BA67-A4E81C316DB9@bex.net>

2010-10-30-22:32:57 Howard Ritter:
> In answer to your question about the low noise level in bright-light
> exposures at ISO 2500, here's my suspicion: The amount of noise in a
> given exposure depends on a number of variables, one of which is the
> duration of the exposure.

Well, maybe.  But I also note that when there's bright light, it's
usually sunlight, while dim light is often something with a warmer
color balance like incandescent lights (or candles).  When I
particularly notice noise, it's often when I start with something with
very little blue energy in it naturally, and try to balance the color
temperature out to look not-entirely-orange.  That requires cranking
up the underexposed blue pixels, which respond by peppering the frame
with blue noise.

Or is it some entirely diffrent phenomenon you're talking about?

 -Jeff


Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] IMG: Roofers at 2500 ISO)
Reply from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] IMG: Roofers at 2500 ISO)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Roofers at 2500 ISO)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] IMG: Roofers at 2500 ISO)
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] IMG: Roofers at 2500 ISO)