Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 35 Summilux question
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:14:42 -0700
References: <20101031145353.68d3b335@linux-ujdg.site> <C8F3394A.5DC0%mark@rabinergroup.com> <20101031153711.138ed48f@linux-ujdg.site>

The way that Leica increases prices, it would be hard to imagine.....

The Pre-ASPH 35 Lux is a nice lens that weighs almost nothing.  It is the
same ( or very close) to the pre ASPH Cron.  If you only use the extra stop
when you are in trouble with the light, it is worth carrying.  Remember, it
is the weight that makes it special.

Optically, the ASPH Lux and Cron are superior...... no doubt about
it.....but weigh a bit to a lot more than the older versions.....

So inherent optical quality or light weight?  Which is it?  Let your
pocketbook help you decide......

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net

A used lens should never approach the cost of the new version.

Phil Forrest





Replies: Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] 35 Summilux question)
In reply to: Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil) ([Leica] 35 Summilux question)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 35 Summilux question)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil) ([Leica] 35 Summilux question)