Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Sentience
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:02:23 -0500
References: <28453325.1288804016846.JavaMail.root@mswamui-thinleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <C6257958-E67E-4DDD-B30A-339052FD132E@mac.com> <20101103194619.GC25821@jbm.org>
 
quite correct Jeff.
help me get it right.

 "using a photograph as a jumping off point to create a digital
  illustration which suggests a work made in a traditional medium"

does that work better?

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist





On Nov 3, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Jeff Moore wrote:

> seems to imply that neither a photograph nor a digital illustration
> may be a "work of art" in its natural form, something I assume and
> hope was not your intent.
Replies: Reply from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] IMG: Sentience)
 In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie Talbert) ([Leica] IMG: Sentience)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Sentience)
Message from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] IMG: Sentience)