Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Tim, If I were still shooting film, I would not hesitate for a moment to pick up an R6 or R8 or R9. The R8 is IMO the most ergonomically correct SLR in existence, and the 100mm Apo Macro is the best lens for the 35mm format, of any brand. And the 60mm macro is not far behind. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog YNWA On Nov 5, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Tim Gray wrote: > Am I being stupid for considering an R at this time? > > Here's my background: I shoot mostly film on a pair of M's, mostly at 50mm > and 28mm. I have a Canon 1V which gets some use, but I only have a 50 and > a 28 for it. Some day I'll pick up a decent digital, but there's no rush > for it now. > > The dilemma: An R is sounding like a good idea. I have no desire to shoot > wide angle on it - the M covers that just fine. This would complement my > M, not replace/back it up. I'm thinking of getting a 90, a 50, and maybe > a macro if I find one for a good price. The 50 only because it's useful > and can be had for not all that much money. > > Is this silly thinking? Should I just get an 85/1.8 or 135/2 for my > Canon? The 1V is a great camera, but can be a bit large. The 50 is a bit > underwhelming at times as well. Or should I just get a 90/2 for my M? > I've already got a 90/4 for it. > > If I do decide to pick up an R, which one would you recommend. The R6.2 > looks nice and is small. The R8/R9 is newer, has more features, but is > larger. The R7 has more features than the R6 and is most likely a lot > cheaper - did this model have a lot of problems? > > Interested in hearing your thoughts on this matter, or anything related. > I don't feel like working today :) > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >