Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At f 11 or f 8 at iso 100 or 160 the difference in format is minimized certainly at these magnifications. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > From: Jeff Moore <jbm at jbm.org> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:36:45 -0400 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Comparison M9, R9 > > 2010-11-06-19:06:03 Tina Manley: >> Here are two shots from today. One with the M9 and 90 Summicron: >> >> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/130103020 >> >> and one with the R9, DMR, and 80 Summilux: >> >> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/130103614 > > Interesting. The M9/90 picture looks crispier, for what that's worth, > but these photos are hard to compare - the M9 picture has harder, more > direct light while the R picture is more cloud-diffused; the white > balances seem different; it's possible that custom DNG profiles would > help, if you haven't already done those; blah, blah, blah. > > For reasons which probably have nothing to do with the equipment used, > I think I like the R one a bit better. It seems like raw material > from which a photo I'd like could be cropped. > > -Jeff > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information