Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/11/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)')
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 16:08:20 -0500
References: <C8FD7E98.6320%mark@rabinergroup.com> <529686F3EB724B03A0DEBEF92EFE19E1@syneticfeba505> <412B27BA635543079FFE29F57C2BAC41@jimnichols> <6DDD4824-819A-484A-B775-3F23BF9F399A@mac.com> <D7CBF09A9F0E4BF393A22D3332E8899A@syneticfeba505> <0C1A6E90-4343-44A0-B1C8-F94A799DEF4C@mac.com>
lens testing takes subtracts from the woefully inadequate time i have for
taking pictures
thanks for sharing results
ric
On Nov 8, 2010, at 4:04 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
> Nor I.
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))