Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]that would have been photoshop 5.0, according to the manual, which i found on csd.uoc.gr, it has unsharp mask, add and reduce noise, and they look largely to be in the same places. So it should work fine, and heck, it would probably run like gangbusters on my super-speedy new computer. It's probably like five megs. Anyone have a copy for the Mac? (actually, now that I think of it, I'd need a Power PC to run it on which probably makes it less probable.) kc On Nov 21, 2010, at 3:59 PM, philippe.amard wrote: > > > > Le 21 nov. 10 ? 21:54, kyle cassidy on the lug a ?crit : > >> >> Certainly the worse the equipment gets the better my output seems to be. >> Though I'm rapidly running out of lousy digital camera history. I'm not >> sure where I go after the Apple Quicktake 100. That is, provided I could >> even find a serial connection for it. Though seriously, after using the >> Ur Digilux, I'm not sure there's anywhere else to go. It has a red dot, >> they're as rare as a pleasant stroll through airport security, and -- did >> I mention the red dot? >> > > Try post processing with software as old as the gear ;-) > > > > Excellent series Kyle, you really are a talentuous photographer. > > Thans for sharing the spirit with us, really. > > Philippe > >> On Nov 21, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Marc Dufour wrote: >> >>> I'm truly enjoying your experiments and approach, Kyle. >>> Keep'em coming! >>> Marc