Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Aggressive Defense, Afghanistan
From: wrs111445 at yahoo.com (W. R. Smith)
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:27:44 -0800 (PST)
 
Which side is supposed to be the "friendly" side?

--- On Sun, 11/21/10, Hugh Thompson <hewthompson at mac.com> wrote:

From: Hugh Thompson <hewthompson at mac.com>
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Aggressive Defense, Afghanistan
To: "Leica Users Group" <LUG at leica-users.org>
Date: Sunday, November 21, 2010, 6:21 AM

Just to give you an idea on how things are here, from the military viewpoint.

We recently did work on some of these:

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Hugh+Thompson/Afghanistan_001/SAM_0269.jpg.html>

Hugh

C&Cs are always welcomed

"Keep cheerful and smile, sometimes it is all you have"

hewthompson at mac.com
Kabul, Afghanistan








_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Aggressive Defense, Afghanistan)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] IMG: Aggressive Defense, Afghanistan)
 In reply to: Message from hewthompson at mac.com (Hugh Thompson) ([Leica] IMG: Aggressive Defense, Afghanistan)