Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have tested my big catalog against a small one. It didn't make any difference in the speed a file loaded. in searching however it did make a difference. Cheers, Michiel Fokkema On 29 November 2010 17:49, Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com> wrote: > also, if your disk is getting full, it will slow things down drastically as > it swaps files around in virtual memory > > ric > > > > > On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Peter Cheyne wrote: > > > Thanks, Daniel, > > > > maybe I can put 4 GB of RAM in this MacBook Pro, but it will only act as > 3. Or something like that, which I obviously don't understand properly. I > dug around a bit and found a thread that helped. The last post in that > thread suggests that in my Mac's case, 3 GB would perform better than 4 GB. > (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=493133). > > > > I just looked at my Lightroom catalogue and see I have close to 9000 > photos in there now. How would I go about creating a new catalogue? If I > work out how to do that, I think I should split this 9000 strong catalogue > in two also. > > > > All the best, > > > > Peter Cheyne > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- -------------------------------------------- Fokkema Fotografie www.michielfokkema.com michiel.fokkema at gmail.com GSM:+31 (0) 615569576