Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]from 1969 to 1977 my 21 SA 3.4 lived on my M2 when I carried them along with an M3 with 35 and 90 crons 24/7/365 Regards, George (from iPad) On Dec 15, 2010, at 2:17, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > I've used the 3.4 SA with film for 2/3's of a roll. Really did love using > it > and the results. I guess the way a lens makes you feel counts! > > > -------------------- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > mark at rabinergroup.com > Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > > > > >> From: Philip Forrest <photo.forrest at earthlink.net> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:47:10 -0500 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Super Angulon >> >> I've gotten to play with a SA and love it. It's half the size of the ZM >> 21mm that I have. About a full stop slower but at 21mm that doesn't >> make that much of a difference. The rendering of the SA is just >> amazing. Something in it that the ZM lacks maybe. I've been using the >> ZM for about 18 months now and while I love the focal length, the lens >> doesn't do something, but I'm not sure what. What it DOES do is >> definitely stick into the viewfinder at the bottom of the field of >> view. That's annoying. It renders great but I think it just might be >> time for me to move to what I regard as a better lens. (and I talk the >> 21mm ZM up till the cows come home. It's awesome.) Since I got the >> chance to use the 21mm SA though, I really loved the way it made an >> image. It's like an inspiration or something that I don't find with my >> ZM 21mm. >>