Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:15:58 +0100
References: <6EC54D83-17B9-4BC0-946C-E6BE51C5CA8C@gmail.com> <FBCD94E5-4FDC-4DF4-8E5F-251163DB062F@mac.com> <D41F95FE-804C-4693-9B40-987C362FAAE3@gmail.com>

Okay Steve!

Amiti?s
Lluis


El 17/12/2010, a las 23:58, Steve Barbour escribi?:

>
> On Dec 17, 2010, at 2:53 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>
>> Lluis,
>>
>> Just to be clear.
>> I have absolutely no objection
>> to the photograph, your posting of it, or the subject matter.
>>
>> Like others it brought a smile to my face.
>> Which I believe was your intention (humor).
>>
>> (and I certainly have no problem admitting to having a great  
>> appreciation
>> for what appears to be the subject of the photograph)
>>
>> fine food
>> fine music
>> fine friends
>> and
>> fine ?
>> make life livable
>
>
> yes, what he said....
>
> Steve
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
>>
>>> Visions of things are very different according to each eye, which  
>>> of course are all respectable, which should not be a cause of a  
>>> discussion that seems to go beyond the values une image, nor a  
>>> statement on ethics, aesthetics or even morality. They are  
>>> different points of view to which I think it should be considered  
>>> too spontaneity and humor sense.
>>>
>>> Regarding the title of the photo, maybe not the best, but what  
>>> would have happened if the title had been "Nice ass", or "Amazing  
>>> moment"...?. As for the comments on about women, I think the  
>>> concept of feminism has played a trick on how to prejudge certain  
>>> images or things by the mere fact of being women.
>>>
>>> I do not want this type of discussion could lead to a  
>>> confrontation in the group, discussions about one image are  
>>> independent that the photographer is good or bad person, friendly  
>>> or unfriendly.... Therefore, although not to share some opinions,  
>>> or even be radically different, one must not have an offense  
>>> personally.
>>>
>>> Thanks to all all who have commented and and particularly the  
>>> words of support from Dr. Ted, which may actually be who he is and  
>>> have the professional and human history that can boast they are  
>>> worthy of my respect and gratitude.
>>>
>>> As far as I'm concerned, the subject is over, until the next photo  
>>> that maybe can provoke new discussions ...., sorry, my intention  
>>> is not to cause, the images show, talk, have fun...., it's part of  
>>> what we try to do, with better or worse success,  to photograph in  
>>> the street.
>>>
>>> Saludos cordiales
>>>
>>> Lluis
>>>
>>> PS.- Sorry for the translation, I've used Google Translator, I  
>>> hope it has sense according to what I would like to say
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)