Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So the underlying questions become: Does the photographer consider themselves an artist? and Does (s)he call the photograph art? One thing I know for sure Quan displays beautiful black and white photographs on his 1lens blog. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Dec 20, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: > Quan asks, with reference to his photo of a James /dean statue, > > http://1lens.wordpress.com/2010/12/13/james-dean/ > > > "I also wonder when a photographer takes a photograph of someone else's art > work; can he then call his photograph a work of art?" > > - - - - - > > Fear not, Q. Marcel Deuchamp settled this point among artists for all time > by saying "If an artist calls his work 'art', then by definition it is a > work of art."