Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The photo has the tonalities rendered as well as anyone could hope for. Your technique is clearly working. 2010-12-21-03:47:21 Daniel Ridings: > It's simple. I see the light I like, I read it falling onto the > subject in the places I am interested in, and hope for the best > everywhere else. I always use the meter in incident light reading > mode. I've never really come to grips with reflected readings. Most of > the the time you just end up adjusting a reflected reading, based on > the tone of the subject, so that you end right back up with what you > would have gotten with incident light. This completely makes sense. That's always been my reaction to incident-versus-reflected metering. It always seemed to me that if you wanted the tones to just land exactly where they should, automatically, you'd do an incident reading in the same light the subject is getting. Reflected metering would be for when you can't get into the same light to meter it. And incident metering always semed a good match for slide film, and digital sensors are (in my opinion) more similar to chrome film than to negative film. Of course, despite those theories, I spend most of my time using reflected metering, generally trying to figure out some spot on the subject which looks as if it should have the same refflectivity as medium gray. Go figure. In my defense, I also spend a lot of time in places with distinct pools of artificial light. -Jeff