Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/12/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Erwin and the S2; comparison
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:13:31 -0800
References: <C935A22E.817C%mark@rabinergroup.com> <1CD6B5C4-1ED7-4E1B-89FB-7FD33EC3EEA3@frozenlight.eu> <AANLkTi=ADTfr59wSr_shitKfuUROyGHnCt7c09YfJLC_@mail.gmail.com> <FE6BBD19-A5C6-47BA-9349-EEF2E5F744BC@frozenlight.eu> <AANLkTimj-6Kt6GNQ-1KdcjwLM9O39-CiEWkh9J2H2Pks@mail.gmail.com>
I would find it hard to believe that the technology of the sensor at all
affects the SW...... in the sense that it is radically different....
Maybe there are subtle differences, but certainly a file is a file. Process
it as you see fit......CCD or CMOS
Nikon has focused on the SW and seems to be doing pretty good..... Leica
lags ....Simple fact.
Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net
Also, 3 letters: CCD. A major part of the digital camera R&D is on the post
processing software, and I am referring to getting the best RAW data out of
the sensor, not the JPG engine and Leica's expertise (so far) is on CCD
sensors. It would have taken them a lot longer to get a CMOS team going.
Replies:
Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Erwin and the S2; comparison)
Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Erwin and the S2; comparison)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Erwin and the S2; comparison)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Erwin and the S2; comparison)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Erwin and the S2; comparison)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Erwin and the S2; comparison)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Erwin and the S2; comparison)